Which Online Degree Programs Are in Demand: Evidence From Accounting and Marketing Majors
Keywords:
business, economics, online program design, first-gen college students, accounting major, marketing majorAbstract
We seek answers to the following research questions: 1) What online degree program attributes are attractive to college students? 2) Which individual demographic variable(s) affect students’ preference for different online programs? 3) How do students' academic fields affect their online program preference and willingness to pay? Results from a survey of 314 participants suggest that college students value and are willing to pay more for online business degree programs that offer concentrations or are taught by regular full-time faculty. Regression results indicate that first-generation college students are more cautious with their education investments than their counterparts. Additionally, while accounting students prioritize online programs with concentrations or full-time regular faculty, a larger percentage of them are reluctant to pay more compared to marketing students.
References
Adedoyin, O.B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Bigatel, P., & Williams, V. (2015). Measuring student engagement in an online program. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 18.
Bragg, L.A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
Carlton, G. (2024, August 23). 2025 online learning statistics. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/advisor/education/online-colleges/online-learning-stats/
Castro, M.D.B., & Tumibay, G.M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Chapman, D.W. (1981). A model of student college choice. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(5), 490–505.
Clary, G., Dick, G., Akbulut, A.Y., & Van Slyke, C. (2022). The after times: College students’ desire to continue with distance learning post pandemic. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 50(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05003
Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864
Gallagher, S., & Palmer, J. (2020). The pandemic pushed universities online. The change was long overdue. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2020/09/the-pandemic-pushed-universities-online-the-change-was-long-overdue
Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K.S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62(3), 207–221.
Lansing, J. (2017). A new model of college choice for distance learners. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(3), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516673183
Litten, L.H. (1982). Different strokes in the applicant pool: Some refinements in a model of student college choice. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(4), 383–402.
Liu, X., Bonk, C.J., Magjuka, R.J., Lee, S.H., & Su, B. (2005). Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1777
Madupu, V., & Gunderson, K. (2024). Differences in perceived value of team projects and learning styles of accounting and marketing students. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 31(1), 56–64.
Manley, K., Han, Y., Ryan, M., & Serkan, C. (2019). Undergraduate students’ willingness to pay for online courses. Journal of Education Finance, 45(2), 232–252.
Mann, J.T., & Henneberry, S.R. (2014). Online versus face-to-face: Students preferences for college course attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 46(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800000602
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Table 311.15. Number and percentage of students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by distance education participation, location of student, level of enrollment, and control and level of institution: Fall 2020 and fall 2021. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_311.15.asp
Noel, N.M., Michaels, C., & Levas, M.G. (2003). The relationship of personality traits and self-monitoring behavior to choice of business major. Journal of Education for Business, 78(3), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309599713
Peterson, M. (2021). Teaching the online marketing research course for MBA students. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(3), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753211001422
Pringle, C.D., Dubose, P.B., & Yankey, M.D. (2010). Personality characteristics and choice of academic major: Are traditional stereotypes obsolete? College Student Journal, 44(1), 131–142.
Pritchard, R.E., Potter, G.C., & Saccucci, M.S. (2004). The selection of a business major: Elements influencing student choice and implications for outcome assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 79(3), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.79.3.152-156
Ryan, M., Han, Y., & Manley, K. (2024). Willingness to pay for online courses during the pandemic. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 28(1), 1–20
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190.
Wu, L., & You, J.S. (2022). Synchronous or asynchronous course: Business students’ perspectives on an optimized modality of online teaching and learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 44(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753221093740
Yukselturk, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students’ satisfaction in an online certificate program. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 51–65.
